Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Hopeful, Part 2

"The jury just came back in the Sandusky trial.  Jerry Sandusky was found guilty of 45 of 48 counts."

That lightning bolt, from Ali, employee of the Sunny Times Gas Station that shares the building with three busy Plaza concepts, shattered my hard-won Friday evening peace June 22.  I had punched out ten minutes earlier after a hectic day at Coffee Paradise and was cruising the candy bars at Sunny Times and talking optimistic Pirate baseball (for a change) with Bill, another Sunny Times inmate.

"OMG, OMG, O...M...G....!!!!!!!"

I didn't say it out loud.  I don't recall what I did say, but I remember that I strove to seem calm, to hide, as I am accustomed to doing, the worst of the disquieted chaos that frequently are my feelings surrounding this issue.  My first instinct was to sink into the candy bars and cry, but with a smoothness accrued from years of practice, I made appropriate responses with some aplomb, desiring only to walk home slowly and absorb this complex and mostly happy news.  The tears would come the next day, after I'd had a chance to process a bit.

When I got home, my mother had the news on and was all but bursting with joy at the verdict: 

"I called you and left a message on your voicemail, did you get it?"

"No, but Ali filled me in."

I sat down to watch WTAE's coverage.  Of particular note to me was the fact that the correspondents interviewed several families outside the courtroom who had come with their young children to await the verdict, seizing the opportunity to extract from this evil a teachable moment that might protect someone in this or some future generation.  I am buoyed by the realization, that, though I am often discouraged by the ignorance surrounding this issue (despite the best efforts of many of us, including Oprah, and the rest of what I consider to be a pioneering generation) and the apathy of our society toward effecting any real and lasting change (reflected in the often pitiful response by the justice system), at least our comfort level with talking about sexual abuse, and disseminating it in sometimes exhaustive detail on TV, internet and social media has vastly increased, something I would never have dreamed of in 1984 when I first began to widely discuss my experience with sexual abuse.

The Freeh Report, released July 12, details the results gleaned after Judge Louis Freeh and his firm researched more than 3 MILLION documents pertaining to this case.  Their findings reflect very badly on Tim Curley, Gary Schultz, Joe Paterno, and former PSU President Graham Spanier, as well as Penn State itself.  (For those masochistic enough, as I am, to read through 267 pages, the Freeh report is available at http://www.thefreehreportonpsu.com ).  On July 23, eleven days after the release of the Freeh report, the NCAA handed down its sanctions against Penn State: a $60 million fine, the vacating of 112 wins, a four-year post-season ban, a four-year football scholarship reduction, the athletic program on probation for five years.  The Big Ten issued its own concurrent five-year probation for the athletic department, as well as a four-year ban on post-season play, not that Penn State has too much chance of post-season qualification for awhile anyway.

One bright spot is that money from the NCAA fine, as well as the Big Ten post-season ban, will be used to fund causes dedicated to preventing child abuse, assisting victims and the protection of children.

Well, of course, the was merely Phase 1.  We still have legal proceedings against Schultz and Curley, both accused of perjury and failure to report suspected child abuse, to wade through.  There is at least a possibility that more charges could be filed against Sandusky, as victims, including his adopted son, Matt, continue to come forward, unfurling allegations dating back to the late 70's.  There's the new bio, Paterno, by Joe Posnanski, due out August 21, which may shed some new light on Paterno's role in this tragedy.  There is always the vast possibility that, as more details come to light, Spanier could face charges and that the university could be sued.  (Note, Friday, August 24th, this today from the Associated Press:  Victim 1 is suing Penn State; "another Sandusky accuser has filed a federal lawsuit related to the scandal and a second victim has filed a court notice that he will file complaint."  I rest my case).  I predict this thing is a long way from over.

A long way from over for the victims, as well.  The after-effects of child sexual abuse into adulthood are legion, and well-documented.  Depression, suicide, substance abuse, eating disorders, sexual and reproductive system dysfunctions are just a few I can name off the top of my head.  Girls who are sexually abused are more likely to marry/become involved with physically, sexually and verbally abusive men; boys are more likely to become abusers themselves.  For a much more complete list of the costs of child sexual abuse to our society, check out D2L.org -- go to the tab on the top left "The Issue" and click on "Statistics" and "Economic Impact" in turn and you will learn plenty, believe me.

One of the more astonishing findings, even for me, is that childhood sexual abuse shrinks the hippocampus and the pre-frontal cortex, parts of the brain that deal with memory and stress responses.  This explains why abuse memories can be locked away for many years, also why they can "pop up" often at unexpected and inopportune times.  It also helps explain the tendency for victims to develop post-traumatic-stress-disorder (PTSD), and depression, and why those conditions are so resistant to treatment.  The theory is that this shrinkage is caused by stress hormones released by the brain at the time of the abuse.  Stress hormone levels can remain high for long periods of time after an incident of abuse, and if abuse is severe or frequent, high stress hormone levels can be constant.  My guess is that scientists will find links to higher incidence of other conditions in survivors relating to stress hormone levels, such as obesity, heart disease, cancer, strokes, asthma, ulcers, and inflammatory bowel disease, among others.  I'm only guessing this because high stress hormone levels are linked with these diseases in the public at large.

The most striking after-effects I've suffered are asthma, PTSD, depression, lack of trust in others, tending to expect/believe the worst in others, lack of respect for authority, obesity, and a feeling of isolation, of being different from others.  Sometimes this difference takes the form of feeling superior -- "look at so-and-so, (s)he's whining about _____, imagine him/her being molested.  (S)he'd never be able to handle it."  Followed by a rather smug self-smile.  (Yes, I know.  I'm not proud of that, but I'm being honest.  We're only as sick as our secrets, after all).  But much of my feeling different is centered around watching others play The Mating Game.  Oh, some people are very good at it.  And I know that The Mating Game is difficult for a good many people who have never been molested.  But trust me when I tell you being molested adds a much deeper shade of difficulty than anyone can imagine who has never been there.  It is very difficult to conduct any kind of interpersonal relationship when you can't trust and you feel you must be in control all of the time, especially in intimate relationships.  Often, I'm aware of it if I start trying to control other people, and I stop.  But surprises?  Spontaneity?  Not much in Claudia's vocabulary.  Flirting?  Kinda scary unless I'm well acquainted with someone.  It's hard for me, maybe for most survivors, to feel genuinely comfortable playing The Mating Game, doing that whole dance.  It's a struggle, almost more of a struggle than it's worth sometimes.  Trying to play can be very frustrating; the alternative is a steady dose of loneliness.  It's hard to find a way to win. 

It may be that my situation is more complicated than most.  My abuser lived with me.  (Strangers account for about 10% of abuse; acquaintances, 60%.  About 30% of abusers are family members, not all of whom live with the ones they abuse, so those that live with their abusers are way in the minority). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse
I think it's very different when your abuser lives with you.  When your abuser is someone you see only occasionally, you may have at least an illusion of safety; the abuser has occasional access -- you can prepare for their advent, perhaps find an excuse to be somewhere else or not to be alone with them.  They definitely do not have the access to you that someone who lives with you does.  When your molester lives with you, they have many more opportunities to be alone with you.  You never know when they are going to victimize you; whenever you and they are at home, or together as often as someone who lives with you will be, you are fair game -- tell me that doesn't do something to a child's stress/fear level!  You never feel safe.  I once knew a woman who was bulimic.  She had been raped -- and I know that being raped once is bad enough -- she wouldn't go to any beach at all, ever because she was raped on the beach.  Imagine being molested in any and every room of your house -- do you think you would have flashbacks?  What would just getting up everyday and living there feel like?

Also, my abuser was not just sexually abusive -- he was a controlling, physically and verbally abusive alcoholic.  He was so controlling, he didn't allow my mother and me to listen to anything but the local country music station.  Deviation from this rule earned ridicule, name-calling and the like.  Watching my beloved Penguins was verboten.  Once when my stepfather caught me watching them, he cursed me out, forbade me from watching them again because "only pussies and faggots play hockey" (!!!).  When I was 11, my stepfather came home from a hunting trip.  My mother and I had been at my aunt and uncle's house since the previous day, my dog had been alone in the house, and feeling abandoned, he had torn a softball-sized hole in our sofa.  My stepfather beat the dog and kicked him, then while picking my mother and me up, bragged to my aunt, uncle and later my grandparents that he had "beat his ass and punted him like a football" down the cellar steps; then he kept him penned in the garage through a record-cold 1976-77 winter, where Rex's food and water frequently froze, forbade my mother and I from petting or playing with him, and when the dog didn't run away after a year of this, he took Rex up in the woods and shot him.  This is the kind of abuser some of us must live with.

In all probability, the long road has just begun for Sandusky's victims.  Based on my experience, it is my belief that this time is crucial for them.  First of all, Sandusky was convicted of 45 counts.  This was happy news to people like me because it means he's off the streets, he can't harm any child as long as we keep him there, which hopefully will be until his death.  (In about a month, he will be sentenced, and we will know the answer to that).  It is my hope that he is sentenced to the maximum for each count, not so much to send a message to potential child molesters -- I believe that they are in the grip of a disease that, in all probability, is aided and abetted by a biological/biochemical process that may be almost as irresistible as puberty or menopause.  (More on that in a later post).  No, I would like to see a long sentence for Jerry Sandusky in order to send the appropriate message to society.

Basically, the response of a survivor's loved ones during this time and for years to come will, in my experience and what I've seen in other survivor's lives, make or break the degree, speed, and quality of the survivor's recovery.  Period.  And our society has much to learn about how to support the survivor.

People have a fear and revulsion about sexual crime.  Understandably so: Rape and molestation are very searing, intimate crimes that we all sense can do profound damage.  We cannot, do not want to think of that kind of trauma.  We want to shy away from it, avoid it, minimize it.  We certainly don't want to think that someone has been an innocent victim of such a crime; if it could happen to them, it can happen to us, too.  So if we find a way to blame the victim, we can convince ourselves it may have happened to them, but we would do this or that differently, so it would never happen to us.  No one not elected for public office is second-guessed more than a sex-crime victim, from the advent of the crime, through prosecution (if that occurs), and recovery (if that occurs).  And that is counter-productive and hideously wrong.  I know, I've been there, and I can tell you that after being molested by the abuser, a survivor can wind up feeling raped by the justice system, and assaulted by his/her loved ones and some of their reactions.  The aftermath can feel much worse than the abuse itself.  A social worker I once discussed this topic with assured me that these reactions are "due to ignorance and not lack of love" on the loved ones' parts, but sometimes this is hard to believe or remember.

No matter what it takes, it is incumbent upon us as a society to work past these knee-jerk reactions if we are to help victims.  The recovery of the victim, their transformation into survivor, and finally victor, depends upon our willingness and ability to put the victim and his/her recovery above our discomfort, to not second-guess or blame them for any action they took or failed to take during and immediately after their abuse, nor minimize their suffering during their recovery.

A couple of recent incidents at The Plaza remind me that, although we've come a long way with sexual abuse since I came of age, we still have a long way to go.  It's very hard, painful and frustrating for me to watch victims fight the same battles I've been fighting for some 30 years.  Sometimes it feels like we can never make enough headway, nor fast enough.
 
There is a man around 50 years old who comes to Coffee Paradise virtually every weekday.  He used to come in, talk an overly long time with one particular young girl, ask her rather personal questions, ask about her when she wasn't there, and just generally acting in a way that made her uncomfortable, "creeping on her", the kids call it. 

He never really quite crossed the line, you understand: he was known to exchange pleasantries with a few of us, but he didn't get that personal, ask about, or hang around anyone else.  The young girl in question told me she felt uncomfortable, so I told her to report her feelings to the manager-in-charge (MIC).  The MIC that day, a female in her late 50's, kind of blew off the girl's concerns, saying, "Oh, he's just from a time and a place where people want to know who's serving them.  Alot of people that age from small towns are the same way."  I told her I thought he was creepy and that I had only seen him behave that way with this one girl.  She did not report the girl's concerns up the chain of command.  I confess, being rather battle-worn and cynical about society's response to this issue, and having seen our company's lack of response to more mundane matters, that other than to comment privately to the MIC in question that I still thought this guy was trouble and the whole thing should be further pursued, the fact that the girl herself did not further pursue the situation at that time temporarily stifled me (and my own history, as well as the MIC's response, caused me to second-guess myself), and I didn't report the situation up the chain of command either.  I won't be making that mistake again.  However, several of us covered for the girl repeatedly when the guy came around, hiding her.  And I made a point of unobtrusively bringing him to the attention of other MICs.

It took an incident a few months later on one of my days off to take matters to the next level.  One of our college students was working with the girl one day when the man came in. The student, who had been away from Coffee Paradise at school for a few months, saw his strange behavior, heard the girl's tale, and, no shrinking violet she, called on the MIC, (a man a few years younger than me who doesn't work as many evening shifts and didn't know the situation), told him what was what and basically strongly requested action.  The MIC (who is also The Plaza's assistant manager) went up the chain of command and was told to handle the situation.  My understanding is that he spent more than an hour explaining to the customer that he was scaring the girl, why his behavior was inappropriate, and that he needed to tone it down or he would be barred from The Plaza.

What brought the whole thing to my attention again was that one day, about a week after his talking-to, I was on my break buying a Coffee Paradise fruit cup; the customer was ahead of me in line, but motioned me to go in front of him.  He asked me the name of the MIC who had spoken to him.  I gave him the name and he said, "Well, he was very mean to me the other day -- my feelings were hurt."  I asked him what had happened.  He told me basically he was told that the girl had been put off by some of his behavior and that he had been told to tone it down or take his business elsewhere.  The MIC in question happened to be there that day, so I asked if he wanted to talk to him or another manager; he said no, but reiterated his feelings were hurt, so I told him I'd look into it.

While still on break, I was called to the office on another matter, so I mentioned the whole thing to the store manager, and between her and the MIC who had spoken to the guy, I got a portrait of a hour+ long conversation with a creeper who evidently played dumb as to why his behavior was upsetting the young girl, but did agree to tone it down.  The MIC and I were both rather agape at the customer's narcissistic "hurt feelings" -- I said if it had been me, I'd have been rather embarrassed that I had upset anyone that much if my actions were innocent.

So, although management's response was appropriate, I wish I could say the same for some of our co-workers, many of whom acquired the opinion "he's harmless, he's not going to do anything wrong, (the young girl) just wants attention, she's making a mountain out of a molehill, she needs to shut up and get over it..."  This even before the assistant manager had dealt with the situation.

Funny how people said the same thing about me after I suffered at least ten years of abuse a generation ago.

Funny, too, that some of her detractors had formerly protected her, warning her when he was in the building, and waiting on him so she wouldn't have to. 

(The customer has since toned his behavior down and the young woman waits on him like any other customer.  But those of us concerned are always on guard until he leaves the building).

I think I am most surprised and disappointed when a survivor makes a detractor-like comment.  Not long after the NCAA's sanction announcement, I talked to a survivor friend who is another employee at Sunny Times.  We usually agree on most things, especially in regards to this topic, so I was a little taken aback to hear her disapproval of the sanctions:

"They're punishing innocent people along with the guilty.  Kids are gonna lose their scholarships, and they won't be able to play football.  Those boys (the accusers) should have spoken up alot sooner and then most of this never would've happened.  If people didn't listen, they should have just kept on telling people until someone did something," she fumed.

I think it goes without saying I was dumbfounded.  Disappointed, angry, devastated.  My friend Chris is notoriously fast on her feet.  Adroit, clever, dryly amusing.  Laugh-out-loud so, frequently.  Sometimes quite cutting.  Almost daily I wish for just a touch of her ability.  This one time I'm glad I didn't have it.  I would have lost a friend.  I'm loquacious, articulate, especially in print.  But when I'm upset, my Gemini silver tongue often fails me, and I stutter or fall tongue-tied.  A thousand thoughts crowded my mind.  If any kids were losing a spot on the team or a scholarship (which I was pretty sure was not true, but I didn't want to say that until I had investigated, in case I was wrong), what about all the thousands of students, employees and others who benefited all these years from an opulent football program that prospered on the backs of at least ten innocent abused boys?  Punishment's unfair?  That's a matter of opinion.  But I believe the message Penn State and our society in general needs to receive here is to get our priorities in order.  Football is not more important than education.  And nothing is worth the sacrifice of one precious soul to abuseNothing!! 

And innocent people besides the victims are routinely sacrificed in the area of sexual abuse because our society hasn't yet risen up righteous to rid itself of this evil.  Those who have relationships with us, for example.  Yes, some of them are informed beforehand and consent to enter into relationships with us.  But I doubt that many of them would make that choice, if they truly knew what they were getting into.  Our children, for another.  They don't choose their parents.  (One reason I chose not to have kids is because being molested changed the way I see the world.  I see the world through the filter of ANYONE COULD BE A MOLESTER.  I wasn't safe when I was a kid, how can I be sure I could keep my kid safe?  I would not be able to stand having my kid resent me the way I resent my mother at times for failing to protect me).  The punishment, if it was affecting scholarships, etc., I thought, simply symbolized the way things are in the larger world.  If people are mad about that, they need to do their part to end sex abuse, then this will no longer be a problem.

But the remark about the accusers was the one that devastated me.  ARE YOU KIDDING ME, I thought.  Those ten boys who hung in there together through spotlight-glare, death threats, and accusations of fortune-hunting are the reason Jerry Sandusky is no longer molesting boys. They and the jury who convicted Sandusky, and I feel that the NCAA and Big Ten gave a punishment that fit the crime.

It's fine to talk about disclosing abuse until someone takes action, but this case is alot more complex.  For most of us, telling on the abuser is hard enough.  They may have threatened us.  They may be giving us goodies as part of the grooming process -- in this case there was access to the team, the university, going to big games, staying in nice hotels, the (non-sexual) attention of rich and influential men of the community.  Adults have trouble deciding to give up benefits like these; you're asking a child to make a moral decision like that?  (And in this case, underprivileged boys with few male role models).  And these kids were probably well aware that dealing with a man the stature of Jerry Sandusky would involve court, publicity.  Who would want that many people aware of their victimhood, wondering if they'd asked for it, questioning their sexual orientation, which frequently happens when boys are molested by other males.  All of this in the spotlight, for the public record.  Who among us is that brave?  Probably not I.  Maybe not 90% of us, even if we're capable at that age of making the moral decision of putting a creep away to protect others.  Those boys are heroes.

(For more on why many victims don't report their abusers, see www.prevent-abuse-now.com/stats.htm/ .  Scroll down to "Disclosures" and "Allegations", and there will be plenty for you to see).

Those and probably a thousand other thoughts bumped against each other in my head, screaming to be heard.  I did articulate a few of them, not very well, but at least fairly quietly, considering my level of turmoil.  Then I put in the rest of my day and went home very depressed that we're still fighting some of these battles. 

(BTW: those at Penn State who are able to transfer out to another team can do so without penalty; those who can't will still be able to retain their scholarships -- I think my friend heard an erroneous news report about that).

In my previous post on this topic, I asked you not to be detractors.  We need you to be supporters.  After the molestation is over, victims start off at the Dead Sea, way below sea level, carrying hundreds of pounds of weight in the form of our pain, shame, fear, anger, betrayal and mistrust, which we must carry hiking a long path of healing in the dark and cold that leads to a place that's as high as Mount Everest.  We may or may not have a map for this journey.  Hopefully, we can drop the extra weight along the way, or at least at the end of the journey, but there are no guarantees.  It's a long, hard and scary journey.  Simply put, if you're not for us and with us, helping us on this journey, you're against us.  If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.  If you're not a supporter, you're a detractor.  Shut up, get out of the way, and let us make our journey in peace. 

We must remember, if we're able to successfully complete the journey, we will stand at the top of the world.


 

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

The Sad End of One Era...The Hopeful Beginning of a New -- Up To You!

After five days of a seemingly ever-unfolding sex abuse scandal at Penn State University, Coach Joe Paterno has today announced his retirement at the end of this season.

A stunning and sorrowful end to a stellar career, it will be said many times in the coming weeks. On October 29, Joe Pa surpassed Eddie Robinson of Grambling to become the winningest coach in Division 1 history with 409 victories. Much will be made of the national championships, "Linebacker U", the myriad of players who went to the NFL during Joe's 46-year tenure. It is not my intention to participate in that litany.

I want to talk about how this scandal has affected me personally. I am a sex abuse survivor. Rarely in my life have I been so profoundly and painfully conflicted.

My mother married my stepfather in 1969, when I was not yet 4 years old. By my stepfather's own admission to me, he began molesting me at age 5. I personally doubt he waited that long. I can't believe that any molester would wait more than one year when they have such a prime, thick, juicy opportunity in front of them. He continued molesting me until at age 15 I told him that if he ever laid a hand on me or my mother again (he hit and verbally abused both of us, as well), I would kill him. He must have believed me, too, because his behavior, with alcohol and womanizing, spun out from that point on. It took my mother 16 months after my pronouncement to my stepfather to become fed up and throw him out. Their divorce was final in July, 1982, when I was 17.

At that point, I thought the nightmare was over, but I was to discover that 10+ years of abuse is not recovered from that easily. At 19, I began three years of psychotherapy, but my true therapeutic journey continues to this day, with hundreds of books and articles read on the topics of sexual abuse, spousal and child abuse, alcoholism, verbal abuse, marital rape, you name it. All of the things my mother and I went through in the 12 years she was married. I have spent countless hours watching movies, from 1984's groundbreaking "Something About Amelia" to anything "based on true events"; anything on Oprah or Donahue or the quality network talk shows; and of course, the radio talk shows everytime a fresh scandal breaks. Some of you may disagree and that's fine, but I consider myself as much or more of an expert as anyone who hangs up a shingle and/or has capital letters after their name.

And then there's my love for Penn State. In 1977, I saw the movie, "Something For Joey", starring Geraldine Page, Gerald S. O'Loughlin, Marc Singer, and Jeff Lynas. It tells the story of the bond between 1973 Heisman Trophy winner John Cappelletti and his younger brother, Joey, a leukemia victim. The message of the movie was how family, team, and the illness of his beloved brother strengthened and inspired John, how they made him so much more than he might have been otherwise. In the movie, you see a Coach Paterno who allows the effervescent Joey access to the Penn State locker room, who visits the Cappelletti home bearing gifts and sharing a meal. Already a proud Steeler fan, I must have been looking for a college team to root for, because after the movie, which she did not at that time see, I grilled my mother about Coach Paterno. "Well, all I know is he makes his students carry a certain GPA, and if they don't, he benches them till they do. That's what he did to Franco Harris's brother. He said, 'You're here to get a degree and prepare for the world out there. Football comes second. You gotta think about what you're gonna do the rest of your life after football or if there is no football.' He's got his standards," was Mother's summation.

Hmmm, I thought, well then that's my kinda coach, and the Penn State I saw portrayed in SFJ was my kinda team. And for some 34 years, that's the way it was. I would shut down any criticism of PSU or Joe, (especially recently as his age has encroached and he no longer prowls the sidelines or chases down refs, and some say the game has passed him by), with shouts of "WE ARE, PENN STATE!" and "GO GO PATERNO!" (Second one's catchy, huh? It's my invention, for what that's worth now). I was kind of excited because the Nittany Lions were contending for the Big Ten title this year with only one loss, and this without a clear-cut starting QB most of the year.

I didn't even hear the news right away because I worked all weekend, and I live with a 73-year-old who refuses to watch the news anymore since WTAE unceremoniously dumped her favorite chief meteorologist a few months back, but when I did, it was like being on a bus that's cruisin' along on the PA Turnpike at 65 MPH, and then suddenly hits the brakes. WTF!!! ARE YOU KIDDING ME??!! AT PENN STATE?!

And so the story has raged on like an out-of-control forest fire since I found out about it late Sunday. I've watched, by turns numb, glum, and agonized. Opinions are legion, and varied, on who should receive what punishments, and when, and what the legacy of this coach and his football program should be, and how Penn State goes on from here. Some of those things will be settled by the courts, some by history, and some of it really doesn't amount to a hill of crap, in the scheme of things.

As my mother said in our conversation about it today, "It's sad that Joe has to go out this way after all these years, but he made his decision about how to proceed, and he made the wrong decision and these things happen when we make the wrong decisions sometimes." Amen. I would add that I hope that the extent of this scandal is not so deep and ugly that Joe's 46 years of contributions not only to Penn State University, but also the town of State College, aren't totally dismissed and forgotten. Joe Pa put State College on the map. Period.

(As I write this, a crawl across the screen of WPXI, the NBC affiliate in Pittsburgh, has revealed that both Joe Paterno and university President Graham Spanier have been fired, joining Tim Curley and Gary Schultz as those who have lost their jobs over this scandal). Okay, what about Assistant Coach Mike McQueary, who witnessed the alleged incident with Sandusky and the 10-year-old boy in the shower, and reported it to Paterno, but never to the police? Shouldn't he go, as well, if we are to be fair and consistent?

I mentioned I was conflicted. Many of you are probably concluding my conflict is between my status as an abuse survivor and my love for Penn State. I admit that it's been alot harder to see this as black and white as I normally would. And I'm feeling quite betrayed because I believed in Joe Pa's "Success With Honor" mantra. But my real and profound conflict is with the society I live in. There was clearly a moral failing at Penn State, but I believe it is reflective of a larger moral failing in our society. We have worked together to bring about social change before; we are still capable of doing it, as our "Occupy" movement shows. Why not with sexual abuse? If we want to end sexual abuse in our world, we can. Why haven't we? While we point one finger at Paterno & Company, our other fingers point back to us.

As someone with a vested interest, I have been keeping track of child sex abuse scandals since the '80's. The sequence of events is predictable: 1. News of the scandal breaks. 2. The details come, "fast and furious". 3. The public reacts in a rabid rage, demanding justice, resignations, money, long jail terms, castration, even death. 4. Interest subsides, with perhaps a mild renewal when/if some semblance of justice is served. 5. Little, if any lasting change is accomplished.


"People get fired up because these situations serve as a mirror, reflecting where we are as a culture." Oprah Winfrey

We should desire punishment of those who are guilty of sacrificing the vulnerable to the powerful, and those who see and remain silent. What we are guilty of is stopping there, with a certain degree of...smugness? Laziness? Complacency? What we need to do is get up off our dead asses and work until this society no longer permits sexual abuse. Period.

Those of you who are parents and grandparents, ask yourself: Who are the sex offenders in your neighborhood? Don't have any? Yeah, right! Think again. Want the real answer? Go to http://familywatchdog.us or http://www.nsopw.gov -- follow the prompts and enter the pertinent information about where you live. Names of sex offenders in your area, complete with details of their offenses and pictures, will pop up for your inspection. Have an iPod or iPhone? Go to the App Store and search for "Sex Offenders". Available are about 12 apps. I use Sex Offender Lite, which is free and good, but there are nine free apps, and three pay apps, ranging in price from $.99-$3.99. What's $4 if keeps our kids safe? 


Ask yourself: What behaviors might a molester manifest that differentiates him/her from someone who just likes kids? Do you know? Are you sure? Molesters like to "groom" their victims. Just what does it mean to "groom" a victim -- what behaviors constitute "grooming"? What kind of qualities and traits are molesters looking for when picking likely victims? Are most molesters strangers or known to their victims? (The vast, vast majority of molesters are known to their victims, through school; some activity the child is involved in; married to, dating, friends with, hired as babysitter by a parent; or a family member, which means you have an opportunity and a responsibility to run them through your filter). What changes might occur in your child's behavior to indicate he/she was molested? Do you know?

We all would like to think we would be able to identify a molester, we would all like to think we would know if our kid was molested -- our "radar" would tell us, but let me tell you, my mother lived with a child molester for twelve years, and he did and said some things that should have raised red flags as big as the moon, yet she swears up and down she didn't know. This has been the hardest thing I have ever tried to understand and forgive in my whole life and history with this very painful topic. Not the child molester, who, because I came to believe he was in the grip of a very powerful illness, I managed to forgive in about 8 years. But with my mother, the "healthy" one, who I have viewed at times as an enabler, that forgiveness is sometimes one step up and two steps back, while resentment toward her is kind of like a cancer, active or in remission depending upon other aspects of our relationship at any given time.

My contention is that we rage and desire to punish so that we don't have to face our resposibility as a culture; and that there, but for the grace of God, go you and I. We'd all like to think if we were Joe, Tim, Gary, or Mike we would have gone to the police, but here's the truth: The average molester offends 100-300 times before the authorities ever become involved. Are you trying to tell me that these molesters are so good at invisibility that 99-299 times no one sees, hears, knows? Gimme a break. And while the offender negatively affects a victim for years, and perhaps a lifetime, on average, they receive mere months, and frequently no jail time at all! I wonder how frequently this knowledge affects the willingness of a potential witness to stick their neck out for a victim?

Do any of you know a sexual abuse victim? Are you supportive of their journey from victim to survivor? All too often, people aren't. Especially in the '80's, I was repeatedly told by friends and loved ones to "get over it', "quit making a mountain out of a molehill", "forget about it". But my heart told me that was not right for me, so alone and with no support, I soldiered on. It was a long, dark, cold and lonely road, but vindication came when I was able to help a few souls like myself, some of my detractors caught wind of that, and the criticism abruptly ceased.

I saw a clip on Oprah recently where she asked an abuser what he thought were the effects of his abuse on his victim, and he said, "I murdered who she might have been." That's exactly right. My stepfather murdered who I might have been, and I was left to mourn her death, then identify the woman who was in my body in her place, where she was hurting, stunted, and toxic, and honor, heal and re-vivify her. All of the movies, books, articles and talk shows were road maps, some of which turned out to be valid paths, some dead ends. Fortunately, I was blessed by God, and strong enough to ignore my detractors and honor and heed my inner voice. I have taken an unconventional path, and I have made many mistakes, and I have some regrets (who doesn't), but all in all, I'm pretty proud of who I am. But not everybody can do what I did, and nobody should ever be so damned alone, so for God's sake if you know a victim, don't be a detractor, please.

And the last challenge I want to give, moving on to the future: The human brain is largely still a vast frontier to medical science. Do you think a molester's brain, nervous system and biochemistry is like a non-molester's? Instead of the mating habits of the tsetse fly and other silly things the ninnies that represent us pick to spend our tax money researching, how about they make it part of a convicted molester's sentence to submit to (humane) research study? It would make at least one segment of the prison population useful to society. Can some of you get behind that and maybe start moving government and medical science in that direction? Think about it. Thank you.

Good vibes to all of you,

Claudia



Sunday, August 29, 2010

An Open Letter To A Tea-Partier

When I walked into The Plaza on Friday, 8/27, I asked, as I usually do, "Busy today?". My Assistant Manager, Bob, observed that The Plaza had been crawling with buses. I inquired what the occasion was. Bob replied, "I dunno, some religious group."

So, very soon after at Coffee Paradise, a busful of these people converged upon us. Addressing the nearest name-tag-chested patron, I asked, "So where're you folks goin'?" and she responded, "We're a bunch of conservatives going down to Washington, DC to try and take our country back and get things back to the way they used to be when things were good!"

(!!!)

Well, of course, on the job we're not really supposed to indulge in the discussion of controversial subjects with customers. Being in that arena lo these many years has taught me that discretion is definitely the better part of valor. But here on my blog, I am so free to speak my mind, so this is what I would have said to that good woman, if I only could have:

Dear Lady,

God bless you. I am sure you have a good heart, and equally good intentions. I give you muchos points for investing in this little weekend soiree, but here are just a handful of reasons why I'm skeptical that any group can affect real and lasting change at this time:

We tab the wrong enemy. After all, if it weren't for liberals, there would be no 40-hour work weeks, no unemployment benefits, no worker's compensation, no Medicare. Yet, nowadays, all a Republican has to do to win votes is call his election opponent "liberal", true or not, and compared to whom? So when did "liberal" become a dirty word? Isn't there enough blame to go around? Believe me, you could stand there and list 100 sins one party has committed, and I could stand here and list 100 the other party has committed, but what would that accomplish, except alot of wasted time, breath and upwardly mobile blood pressure? Real change will come when we resist the temptation to play the blame game and get down to the work at hand. There are alot of things we all can agree need fixing. Let's start there, and build some bridges. After all, doesn't the Eagle need both wings to fly?


We too often fall for personality-driven politics.  My friend Nancy voted for totally inexperienced Steeler Hall of Fame Wide Receiver Lynn Swann for Pennsylvania Governor a few years ago because "he seems nice". Well, good for him. But will he be a good governor? How do we know? What qualifies him? In the 2008 election, first-time voter Kayla asked for my advice as to how to vote. I gave her a review of the Bush Years and asked her if she wanted a repeat of them, but she was still unsure how to vote, so I said, "Kayla, go to http://www.politicalcompass.org/ and take the test. It'll take about 15 minutes to answer the relevant questions that will help you flesh out your political, social, and economic concerns and viewpoints. Then it will show you where you fall on a graph as opposed to the different candidates. That'll help you decide who to vote for." This she did, and was very happy and proud of her choice. Too bad I didn't suggest the same to Joe, who complained to me that he didn't know who to vote for, as he didn't like either McCain or Obama. But how do you explain to a 70+ year-old that he's not so much electing a candidate as a party? After all, don't most candidates toe the party line the vast majority of the time? You would think having been around the block a time or two he would know this but...

The Media is not doing its job. So much for The Fourth Estate. The reasons are legion: The limited public attention span requires the use of sound bites that in no way give even a reasonably complete and accurate picture of our nation's realities; with recent mergers and acquisitions abounding, the many media outlets are owned by fewer and fewer individuals and companies, making it easier for a privileged few to shape public opinion and push an agenda (not to mention any names -- Murdoch, FOX); because of those same mergers, many of the media outlets with the most consumers have strong military/industrial interests -- for example, GE, with its many major Defense Department contracts, owns NBC. And CBS (formerly Westinghouse Broadcasting, with even more DOD contracts), owns the CW, Infinity Broadcasting and CNET, among others. What would anybody with half a brain expect to have happen here?  Also an interesting comment I heard from Dan Rather in a recent documentary, "9/11 Press For Truth", and I'm paraphrasing here because I don't remember exact words, but he said that there is no pressure for journalists to grab the juicy Woodward and Bernstein-type stories anymore, in fact, if anything there is a pressure to bury them, lest a journalist be perceived as unpatriotic/un-American and be fired. Sad.

Recent Tea Party and other events aside, Americans are really not very active participants in the political process anymore. I recently came across a T-shirt in a catalog that read "A citizen of America will cross the ocean to fight for Democracy, but won't cross the street to vote in an election". A rather dubious distinction, is it not? Yet few elections in this country mobilize very much more than half of its eligible voters to do their civic duty. And how many of these are truly informed by more than just the aforementioned sound bites? A minuscule percentage, I'm sure. And how many do the real legwork: Checking how their Senators and Representatives vote, phoning/sending e-mail/snail mail, expressing how they want them to vote, signing petitions, writing letters to the editor, calling talk-shows, marching in local protests, etc.? Do we really have to throw a humongous rally starring Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin to lure people away from Twitter, texting, Dancing With The Stars, or the latest arrest of the latest pop tart? Woe to us if we do!

We close the barn door after the horse has been let out. Take gay marriage, a very hot-button issue of late. In the 1950's, how many openly gay people were there, really? In 1959, after filing a libel lawsuit against the London Daily Mirror, one of whose articles had suggested he was homosexual, superstar pianist Liberace was asked at trial if he had ever engaged in homosexual practices. Liberace replied, "I am against the practice because it offends convention, and it offends society." Of course it was revealed in an equally contentious court case some 25 years later that Liberace had lied through his teeth, but what kind of career would he have had in those days if he had done otherwise? The 1960's changed everything. The sexual revolution, civil rights, women's liberation, these were issues that transformed our society into one that became accepting enough of gays that by the 90's there was pressure to allow them to serve openly in the military for the first time, leading to President Clinton's unpopular "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" compromise. At the same time, a fair number of prominent corporations began to allow coverage of "domestic partners" in their company insurance policies, and due to myriad legal battles over wills, trusts, and living wills, many states enacted laws permitting "civil unions", designed to allow gay couples similar rights as heterosexual married couples in many legal issues. Each one of these changes opened the door a little further than the last. And with nine of the world's countries, as well as five U.S. states, and the District of Columbia permitting gay marriage, as well as the states and countries that don't permit it, but acknowledge the ones performed elsewhere, gosh, Wally, whaddaya think's gonna happen next?  By the time people are debating, Should we or should we not allow this -- let's pass a law allowing/forbidding this practice, it's too late. Once society has moved to the place where the question has been asked, one way or another the ones that want it will agitate to legalize it, and they will succeed. By that time, the ones opposed have already given up too much ground. Their mistake was in allowing things to get to the point where the question could even be asked. Why? Because just as with any other item of social change, once the question is asked, there is a logical progression of popular reaction: "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win." So said Gandhi, and time and time again he has been proven right. So how do you keep the question from being asked? Beats the hell outta me. If we could fight progress we'd still be living in caves eating raw meat. We may not like all the "progress" that comes down the pike, but we are kings and queens of our own castles and we can choose what we let into our domains, and how we raise our children. Let's start there.

The Left-Right Paradigm is no longer valid. It's just a way to keep good people down, divided, distracted and deceived while the politicians and their corporate sugar-daddies rob and oppress us. Simply put, Democrats and Republicans need to stop demonizing each other and unite against a common enemy. Another T-shirt slogan that sums up this point perfectly: "Politicians should be made to dress like race car drivers. Then at least we'd know who their corporate sponsors are." Yep. Or how about this one, "Government of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations." Uh-huh. Google "January 21, 2010 Supreme Court decision on corporations" if you don't believe me, and you'll see what I mean.

So, what to do about all this?
Let's start being real about who's to blame: US. Yes, that's right, us. 230 years ago, after our Revolution against England succeeded, we had power. REAL POWER. Our Founding Fathers, with most astounding wisdom and foresight, hammered out an inspiring document that in no uncertain terms defined our position as Americans; and our fighting men, though largely untrained and badly outnumbered but, I'm convinced, Divinely-ordained and protected, followed up on that bold Declaration by soundly defeating a vastly superior British fighting force not once but twice in 36 years. After which, America led the way in the Industrial Revolution and two World Wars, solidifying its position as a dominant world power.

And what have we done? We've squandered it. How? By becoming too comfortable. By not paying attention. By starting to think that acquiring stuff was more important than keeping the life of Riley we were holding in our hands. By losing sight of what's really important.

"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt." -- John Philpot Curran, 1790

Let's refamiliarize ourselves with the vision of our Founding Fathers and their concept of our country: Remember this: That amazing document from 234 years ago testified to "a candid world" that we are all equal; that we have definite Creator-endowed rights; and that governments only have the power that they have with the "consent of the governed" who employ them (that'd be us); that government's job is to secure the Creator-endowed rights; and whenever any government became "destructive of these ends" it is our right to "alter or abolish it, and to institute new government...as to effect (our) safety and happiness". We take them for granted now, if we're aware they existed at all, but the ideas set forth in the American Declaration of Independence were novel, cataclysmic, transformative and aroused patriots and nations all over the world and throughout the intervening years to their own revolutions. And those ideas are arguably even more relevant today.

Let's get our heads out of the sand, out of our TVs, our computers, our iPhones and our asses, and let's get a clue about what's really going on. When so many gave so much to define, secure and defend these rights against so many long odds and obstacles, how can we, in all good conscience, continue to fumble the baton so badly? We need to stop being reactive, and start being proactive. Go on http://www.politicalcompass.org/ and find out where you fall on the graph, then find out (if you don't know already) who represents you, and vote every chance you get. Then keep an eye on them -- read "How Representatives Voted" in your local newspaper, and keep checking out that paper to see what's going on in the world. Peruse "Newsweek" and its ilk to get some in-depth coverage, or for a refreshing change, check out some foreign newscasts -- the BBC, CBC, whatever suits your fancy -- you'll find alot of U.S. and international news that affects us that never makes the headlines here.

Let's take a page from countries where the governments are afraid of the people, and the citizens have the balance of power in their favor. Send those who represent you, including the President, an e-mail, or snail mail, or give them a call, and tell them how you want them to vote, and why. Then keep after them, and if they consistently don't vote the way you want, get them the hell out, and replace them with someone who will. They work for you, don't they? They are public servants; you are the boss. Then join an organization -- or two -- whose goals are compatible with your values system, and really participate. They're easy to find. March in some parades or demonstrations, raise some hell! Then teach your children and grandchildren to do the same. They're inheriting this country from us, and it's about time we acquaint them with some citizen's rights and responsibilities, (perhaps long-forgotten by many) and get them used to working for them -- and fighting for them, if necessary!

I hope you'll think about it -- then join me in a new revolution, a real one, not party- or personality-driven, but idea- and ideal-driven. One where we build courage, faith, hope and bridges, not doubt, fear, apathy and division.

Good vibes to all of you (especially The Dear Lady!),

Claudia































































































Friday, August 20, 2010

Some Random Thoughts

Tonight's (Friday, August 20, 2010) episode of ABC-TV's "What Would You Do" featured a segment where young child actors stood on a sidewalk looking lost, crying, and asking for help from passersby, to see how many people would actually stop and help. Through two days of filming, over 1700 people passed by the children. 47 actually came shining through. People, we can do so much better.

Yesterday, back at The Plaza where I work, there was a customer, who, along with her husband, were extremely, shall we say, "high-maintenance", a not-uncommon occurrence at the coffee paradise-type concept where I labor. Mr. and Mrs. Greatheart ordered a few drinks and pastries between them over the course of some 20-30 minutes, all of which had to be meticulously prepared, handled, and packaged, as well as several glasses of ice water. Before leaving, Mrs. G ordered yet another item, and yet another glass of water for the road. After all this, the good woman presented me with the princely sum of 85 cents, this being the change from our final transaction. I politely refused, explaining our company's policy against accepting tips. Mrs. G responded something along the lines of, "Gee, what a shame!" and evidently feeling she must leave me something, chose to deposit her straw paper for me to have for my very own!

People, the God's honest here: Offer me a choice between $50, nay, $100 a day in tips vs. people cleaning up their own messes; saying please and thank you; actually standing there to receive your "Positive Parting Phrase", as opposed to walking away while you're in the middle of it; managing to stay off their cell phones from the time they approach to order till they receive their order; actually handing me their money, rather than laying or even tossing it down in front of me; throwing away their own straw papers, receipts, etc.; learning to wait patiently when we're busy; being understanding that, not being a corporate store, we cannot offer them the benefits their accustomed stores do; and finally, realizing that credit card/gift card protobase malfunctions are a fact of life, and much more difficult and annoying for us than for them; which do ya think I'm gonna take? Hint: It ain't the $. People have forgotten how to be gracious these days.

Oh, yeah, and to mention mere trifles: Must we drop repeated conversational F-bombs, sexually harass, or tell our server all our problems on our first meeting? I'm already aware that I have "pretty titties". I spend the $20 each for the bras to house them!! Some of you must be a hoot at cocktail parties.

BTW, I don't mind showing customers where the bathrooms and ATMs are, or offering help with directions, but answering the following questions, which I swear to God, have been directed to me in my 13 years at The Plaza, all but defy my considerable abilities to answer with a straight face:


1. What kind of meat is on a Beef and Cheddar?
2. How many Chicken Fingers in a 4-pack?
3. Is there bacon in a Turkey, Ranch and Bacon?
4. What kind of fruit is in an Apple Turnover?
5. What is a Frappuccino? (It's like a milkshake, sir/ma'am, I reply). Is it cold?

6. What's the difference between a coffee-based Frappuccino and a creme-based one?
7. (And my favorite, from yesterday, 8/19/10): Is your shaken iced tea cold?

These people, for the most part, probably have children, jobs that most likely pay them better and give them mo betta respect and societal status than mine does, and they are driving on the turnpike, for God's sake!

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Good vibes to all of you --
(especially the travelers),

Claudia

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

There's An App For That!

Well, at the rate technology's going lately, the speed of light's the slow lane. I've definitely at times in recent years "limped on down the shoulder on the rim". But not today!

I'm the recipient of a new (to me) iPod Touch, a b-day present from a real great guy I work with named Adam. This was Adam's little treasure before, but since he's moving on technologically, I'm the beneficiary of his generosity. And I'm loving this little puppy.

Those of you who already have one of these little guys don't need me to tell you what all they do. Those of you who don't, I will just say, go out and get one! I will just tell you I am definitely sleep-deprived playing with this thing. Getting apps, adjusting settings, putting stuff in the calendar, looking at various locations on Google Earth satellite, etc. YouTube has gotten a new lease on life with the iPod. Claudia's 8-month-old Wi-Fi radio's on the fritz? Who cares? There's an app for that! Two minutes and Claudia's got Alex Jones and the CBC on her iPod, no problem! I have two different weather channels, with maps, satellites, and a ten-day forecast. Of course, whether I can sync my music library onto the IPod so easily remains to be seen. I have definitely had a love-hate relationship with my Sansa Fuze. Perhaps like many 45-year-olds, I will not set the world on fire with my techno-savvy, and the frustrations putting music on the Fuze before my yearly Niagara trips have been legion, so next week trying to do so with the IPod may have me singing a different tune, but anyway...

What often surprises me is how reluctant some people are to embrace technology. I have an aunt who will only use her computer to play games, as well as an elderly friend who will not go on one at all for fear she'll mess it up somehow. I kind of understand that fear. But I don't share it. On the opposite end of the spectrum are those that grab up every form of new technology, just because it's new. That isn't me either. I didn't get a cell phone until my mother gave me hers to take with me when I went hiking. (Mothers still worry about you, no matter how old you are). I also didn't get an mp3 player until I realized the dubious wisdom of carrying umpteen CDs and a CD player in a carry-on bag. Technology should follow form and function --it should have a purpose beyond "everybody else has one".

Worrisome, too, is the decline of social graces accompanying the dizzying ride of technology. I see it everyday in the workplace -- the people so absorbed in their cell phone conversations they can barely tear themselves away to place their order or confirm its correctness, then they're annoyed with you if you interrupt their call for the purpose of clarification. Too busy talking or texting, they walk away in the middle of your "positive parting phrase" til you almost feel rude in those situations for interrupting them! Too, practically everyday I'll go out for a cigarette with someone and they get on their phone talking or texting. Some of them have kids they must check up on, so their multi-tasking is understandable, but increasingly people have lost the art of face-to-face interaction. Does anyone in this age of Facebook miss real communication and companionship? My fear is they don't. But maybe I'm just an old fart.

One of my co-workers and I were discussing the maps app yesterday and I was saying how cool it was that you can look at your house, or, for example, Niagara Falls, on Google Earth on the iPod, and I said, "Erin, not in my lifetime, but maybe in yours, there'll be a little gizmo about the size of an iPod, and you'll enter a location into it, hit a button, and BOOM! You'll be there! Just like Star Trek." From my lips to Jobs' ear...

Well, I'm off to clean my kitchen. Steve Jobs, is there an app for that?

Good vibes to all of you, most especially Adam!

Claudia

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Do-Over, Anyone?

"Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it." -- George Santayana

"Insanity is defined as doing the same things over and over, expecting different results." -- Dr. Phil

There's a new show on SoapNet, courtesy of the CBC, called "Being Erica". The premise is that every episode allows 30-something Erica a do-over, assisted by her mentor, the ever-wisdom-quoting Dr. Tom. Tonight's episode had Erica, newly hired to a publishing firm, arrive for her first day only to find that the human being that hired her had been fired and replaced by a self-absorbed, snotty little blonde bitch who ground people up into emotional hamburger for the pure pleasure of it. Erica was an assistant, which means basically she made coffee and took notes at meetings. Erica wasted no time getting on this C-word's doo-doo list with an ill-timed faux pas, and the little blonde no-talent wasted no time in turning our heroine into a stuttering, sniveling waterworks. But only temporarily. After advice intervention from Dr. Tom, Erica remembered a similar situation with a college professor who intimidated her until she fled his class, never to return, and received an F for her trouble. Well, before you could say "Quantum Leap", Erica was back in that class, and after a false start during which she quoted from a Britney Spears song that hadn't been written yet, Erica appeared at an Amateur Night at a club filled with her professor, her poetry class, and other assorted ninnies, recited a poem that the professor had trashed, and faced him down. This, of course, gave Erica the courage to deal with her little twit of a boss, who stole one of Erica's ideas, fired Erica, passed the idea off to her boss as if it were hers, and tripped up when the old guy asked for some details. She called upon Erica, who nobly helped her out of her spot. Then she was forced to re-hire Erica and give her a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

Well, we all wish for do-overs. I wish I hadn't blown 2003-5 spending what I didn't have; boy, could I be making hay now if I wasn't in debt! And didn't I know better, having spent 1998-2001 getting out of debt?

Well, the good news is, you don't have to be Erica to get a do-over. Chances are, if you divorce this ninny, you'll be dealing with his drunken, cheating, miserable ass all over again. No, not just in Divorce Court, sweetie. Across the breakfast table. With a different face and name. But that belch will sound awfully familiar. And, sure as the grass grows green, if you just cleared bankruptcy, without some money counseling, you're gonna wind up right back in credit card debt. Or if you had a problem standing up to that one 20 years ago, you're gonna have the same problem with this one now. Just like Erica. And you won't have Dr. Tom's words of wisdom to help you recognize where you went wrong then and how to fix it now.

But you will have a do-over. I guarantee it. Do-over after do-over. But will you recognize the opportunity when it comes? And will you take advantage of it?

Good vibes to all of you,

Claudia

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Snapshot - Claudia's Life Philosophy

OK, so everyone has a life philosophy of some sort, right? Even if we may not be able to articulate it, and have never really thought about it enough to organize it down to a few simple phrases or paragraphs, I'm assuming most of us walk around with a set of beliefs we operate under most of the time. Shoot, that dude that wrote "All I Really Need To Know, I Learned In Kindergarten" made a mint off of writing about his life philosophy, etc. So, at last for public consumption, is Claudia's life philosophy, with the proviso that any and all sections are amendable and rescindable anytime:

Life is a marathon, not a sprint.

Virtually ANYTHING is possible;
Many things are likely;
Few things are probable;
Virtually NOTHING is definite.

Contrary to popular belief, neither death* nor taxes^ are inevitable.
Neither is much of anything else.

"Common sense" is really not so common.

Very few occurrences are truly accidents or coincidences.

There is, as Benjamin Franklin said, "a Divinity which shapes our ends." There is also free will, and thus we are responsible for the choices we make, and their consequences. These two concepts are not mutually exclusive.

Love (i.e., caring concern for the other guy) really does make the world go round.

There really isn't a whole lot wrong that a hot bath, a good night's sleep, a change of perspective, the passage of time, and/or one really decent, loyal, compassionate loved one on your side won't fix. Eventually.

We all gotta help each other.

*Genesis 5:24; 2 Kings 3:11
^Please! You don't want to know how many people don't pay taxes. Mobsters, survivalists, etc. And no, the government does not exert itself to catch them all, for many reasons.

OK, so that's my life philosophy. What's yours?

Until next time...

Good vibes to all of you,

Claudia